Gold chain links connected to a network of dollar, euro, pound, and yen symbols
Point of View
CapitalDigital AssetsOctober 10, 2026

Your Business Is a Real-World Asset. The Future of Capital Formation May Look Very Different.

Why tokenization could open a new path to growth capital for established businesses, and why the opportunity extends far beyond cryptocurrency.

Frank Ricciardi

Frank Ricciardi

Founder & Principal Advisor

For generations, business owners have faced a familiar set of choices when they need capital to grow.

Borrow money.

Sell a meaningful piece of the company to outside investors.

Or, for the relatively few businesses that reach sufficient scale, pursue an initial public offering.

Each path has its place. Each has helped build extraordinary companies.

But each also comes with tradeoffs.

Debt introduces repayment obligations, covenants, collateral requirements, and sometimes personal guarantees.

Private equity can provide substantial capital and expertise, but often requires significant ownership, influence over the business, and an eventual exit.

An IPO can open access to public investors, but it brings considerable expense, disclosure requirements, and the ongoing responsibilities of being a public company.

What about the established business that falls somewhere in between?

A company with real customers, meaningful revenue, valuable assets, and a compelling opportunity to grow, but without the desire to take on more debt, surrender control, or pursue a traditional public listing?

I believe an important new alternative is emerging.

Tokenization is creating the possibility of connecting real businesses and real economic assets to a broader, digitally enabled capital market.

And while much of the conversation has centered on cryptocurrency, the more consequential opportunity may be the financing of productive businesses in the real economy.

The capital formation gap

Consider a hypothetical business generating $30 million in annual revenue.

It has been operating successfully for years. It has customers, equipment, intellectual property, recurring contracts, and a management team that knows its industry.

The company sees an opportunity to expand into new markets, invest in infrastructure, acquire a competitor, or accelerate product development.

But getting there requires $10 million in growth capital.

The owners may not want additional bank debt. They may not want to sell a controlling stake to private equity. And a traditional IPO would be impractical.

The business has value.

The opportunity is real.

What it lacks may not be economic substance, but an accessible and appropriately structured way to connect that value with investors.

This is the gap that deserves attention.

Not every company should go public. Not every company needs venture capital. And not every growth opportunity should be financed through debt.

Yet the alternatives available to many established, privately held businesses remain relatively limited.

Tokenization could help change that.

What does it mean to tokenize a business?

Let's separate the technology from the economics.

Tokenization is the process of representing ownership interests, financial claims, or other rights through digital tokens recorded on programmable infrastructure, often a blockchain.

In the context of capital formation, a company might issue securities that represent equity, debt, or another legally defined economic interest.

Those securities can potentially be represented and administered through tokenized infrastructure.

The important distinction is that investors are not simply buying a digital token.

They are buying whatever enforceable rights the underlying legal instrument provides.

Those rights might include an ownership interest, a claim on specified cash flows, or repayment obligations, depending on the offering structure.

The token is the representation and transaction mechanism.

The real value comes from the business and the rights attached to the investment.

That distinction is fundamental.

An established operating company is an economic asset. Its underlying business activities and financial performance may support a variety of investment structures.

Tokenization does not magically convert that entire business into a liquid asset. It can, however, provide a different infrastructure for issuing and managing securities backed by interests in that business.

This is where the concept of real-world assets, or RWAs, becomes relevant.

The next chapter of real-world assets

Real-world asset tokenization is often discussed in connection with real estate, government bonds, money-market funds, commodities, and other financial instruments.

Those are important starting points because the underlying assets and ownership structures are generally well understood.

But I believe the opportunity is broader.

A productive business is also part of the real economy.

Its value may come from its operating performance, customer relationships, intellectual property, physical assets, and future earning potential.

Tokenization can potentially provide a new way for investors to participate in that economic value through appropriately structured securities.

Consider the possibilities.

A healthcare business seeking to expand its network of clinics.

A manufacturing company investing in additional production capacity.

An energy infrastructure business financing new projects.

A profitable software company seeking growth capital without pursuing a traditional venture round.

A successful boutique fitness franchisor looking to accelerate expansion across the country or take its brand into international markets.

A family-owned enterprise preparing for succession while preserving continuity of ownership.

These businesses are not necessarily trying to create a cryptocurrency.

They are trying to solve a capital problem.

Tokenization is interesting because it may give them another way to solve it.

And the opportunity is increasingly attracting the attention of institutions far beyond the digital asset industry.

This is becoming mainstream financial infrastructure

The institutional momentum behind tokenization is difficult to ignore.

McKinsey's research, From Ripples to Waves: The Transformational Power of Tokenizing Assets, estimates that tokenized financial assets could reach approximately $2 trillion by 2030 in its base case, excluding cryptocurrencies and stablecoins.

Its bullish scenario reaches approximately $4 trillion.

Those figures are forecasts, not guarantees, and much of the expected growth initially involves established financial assets rather than operating-company equity.

But they illustrate the scale of the transformation being considered.

The Bank for International Settlements, an institution that works closely with central banks, has also examined tokenization as part of the next generation of financial infrastructure.

In its 2025 Annual Economic Report, the BIS describes tokenization as enabling:

the integration of messaging, reconciliation and asset transfer into a single, seamless operation.
Bank for International Settlements, Annual Economic Report 2025

That may sound technical.

But the implications are substantial.

Today, securities issuance, ownership records, transfers, payments, and settlement can involve multiple institutions, systems, and reconciliation processes.

Tokenized infrastructure creates opportunities to connect some of these activities more directly, subject to the legal, operational, and regulatory requirements of the market.

The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, a foundational institution in U.S. securities markets, is also advancing tokenization initiatives.

In December 2025, DTCC announced that its subsidiary, The Depository Trust Company, had received SEC staff no-action relief to offer a defined tokenization service for eligible securities.

Frank La Salla, DTCC's President and CEO, described potential benefits including:

collateral mobility, new trading modalities, 24/7 access and programmable assets
Frank La Salla, President and CEO, DTCC

These developments do not mean that every privately held business can suddenly issue tokens and trade them freely.

They do mean that tokenization is moving beyond experiments toward regulated market infrastructure.

The conversation is shifting from whether financial assets can be tokenized to how tokenized markets can operate at scale.

A new path between private capital and the traditional IPO

One of the most interesting aspects of this opportunity is that tokenization does not necessarily require inventing an entirely new securities-law framework.

In the United States, Regulation A provides an existing pathway for eligible companies to conduct public securities offerings without completing a traditional registered IPO.

Under Regulation A, Tier 2, eligible issuers can offer up to $75 million in securities over a 12-month period, subject to applicable requirements and limits.

Unlike many private placements, Regulation A offerings can include both accredited and non-accredited investors, although investment limits generally apply to non-accredited investors.

The offering must be qualified by the SEC before securities can be sold, and Tier 2 issuers face audited financial statement and ongoing reporting requirements.

This is important because it offers a potential route for a business to raise capital from a broader investor audience without pursuing a conventional stock exchange listing.

Now consider combining that existing regulatory pathway with tokenized securities infrastructure.

The company can potentially reach investors through a regulated offering, issue securities with clearly defined rights, and use digital infrastructure to support ownership records and permitted transfers.

The exact structure depends on the company, security, technology, and applicable rules.

But the broader concept is compelling.

A company may be able to access a more distributed investor base while preserving an ownership and governance structure suited to its long-term objectives.

This is not free capital. It is not necessarily non-dilutive capital. And it does not eliminate securities compliance.

If a company sells equity, it still gives investors an economic ownership interest. If it issues debt, it still has repayment obligations.

What changes is the potential range of financing structures, investor access, and infrastructure available to support the offering.

For a business that has never considered public capital a realistic option, that could be meaningful.

The customer as investor

There is another dimension of this opportunity that I find particularly interesting.

Businesses spend years building relationships with customers, employees, suppliers, distributors, and communities.

Those relationships are often among their most valuable assets.

Traditionally, however, the people who know a business best are not necessarily able to participate financially in its growth.

Consider the boutique fitness franchisor I mentioned earlier.

Boutique fitness studios are inherently community-based businesses.

They exist within neighborhoods, but over time, something more interesting happens. Members become a community themselves.

They develop relationships with instructors, staff, and fellow members. They establish routines, build friendships, and develop an emotional connection to the studio.

For many, it becomes much more than a place to exercise.

Now imagine giving that community an opportunity to become investors in the business they already support.

Through an appropriately structured securities offering, eligible members could potentially participate financially in the growth of the brand.

The studio is no longer simply a place where they spend money.

It is a business in whose success they have a vested interest.

And this creates the potential for a powerful flywheel.

Members who believe in the business may become even stronger advocates. They invite friends, introduce new members, participate in additional classes and services, and help strengthen the community that attracted them in the first place.

The company grows. The community expands. And the opportunity for additional locations becomes more compelling.

There may also be opportunities to design new forms of member engagement and rewards, including referral incentives, loyalty benefits, or recognition for participation in the studio's offerings.

These programs would need to be designed carefully, particularly where securities ownership, investment promotion, and compensation for referrals intersect with financial regulations.

But the broader opportunity is fascinating.

A business's most loyal customers could also become part of its investor community, creating a reinforcing relationship between engagement, advocacy, growth, and ownership.

This is not simply a new way to raise money.

It is a different way to think about the relationship between a business and the community that supports it.

And for a franchisor seeking to expand nationally or internationally, an existing network of passionate members could represent a meaningful potential investor audience.

Of course, customer enthusiasm does not guarantee investment demand, and ownership does not guarantee returns. The economics of the business and the terms of the investment must stand on their own.

But the possibility of aligning customers, investors, and the long-term success of a business should not be overlooked.

I have spent much of my career thinking about how businesses create value through relationships, ecosystems, and networks.

This is one reason I find the tokenization opportunity compelling.

Capital formation could become more connected to the communities and networks that help businesses create value in the first place.

That does not replace institutional investment. It introduces another potential source of participation.

Where decentralized finance enters the picture

Tokenization is frequently discussed alongside decentralized finance, or DeFi.

The concepts are related, but they are not interchangeable.

DeFi generally refers to financial services and transactions facilitated through blockchain-based protocols and programmable applications.

Real-world asset tokenization can create digital representations of legally enforceable claims on assets or businesses.

In principle, these assets may become compatible with a broader ecosystem of digital financial services.

That could eventually include more efficient transfers, collateral arrangements, automated distributions, and new forms of financing.

But this evolution depends on far more than technical compatibility.

It requires reliable ownership records, legally enforceable investor rights, appropriate custody arrangements, identity verification, compliance controls, market infrastructure, and credible mechanisms for handling disputes.

And many tokenized securities will continue to operate within regulated, permissioned environments rather than fully open DeFi protocols.

Still, the long-term direction is significant.

The real opportunity is not simply bringing more assets onto a blockchain. It is connecting productive economic value with more programmable financial infrastructure.

That could become one of the most important bridges between traditional finance and decentralized financial technologies.

Liquidity is a possibility, not a promise

We need to be careful with one of the most common claims surrounding tokenization.

Liquidity.

The ability to represent a security digitally does not guarantee that someone will want to buy it.

A tokenized share in a small private company may still be difficult to sell.

Secondary trading may be subject to securities laws, platform availability, transfer restrictions, investor eligibility requirements, and market demand.

A technically transferable token is not the same thing as a liquid investment.

This is a critical distinction for business owners and investors.

Tokenization can potentially reduce certain frictions associated with ownership records and transfers.

But it cannot manufacture demand for an unattractive investment.

Nor can it eliminate the underlying economic risks.

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce made the point succinctly in a July 2025 statement:

Tokenized securities are still securities.
SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce, July 9, 2025

That is exactly the right framing.

The technology may evolve.

The fundamental responsibilities associated with issuing and investing in securities remain.

And that is a good thing.

If tokenization is going to become a credible alternative for established businesses, it must be grounded in investor protection, transparent disclosures, sound economics, and enforceable rights.

The token is the last step, not the first

This may be the most important principle for business owners considering this approach.

Do not start with the token.

Start with the business.

Does the company have an exceptional leadership team with the experience, credibility, and ability to execute?

Is the company financially sound?

Does it have a credible strategy for growth?

What capital does it actually need, and why?

What assets, cash flows, or ownership interests could support an investment?

What rights would investors receive?

How will the company generate returns or otherwise deliver on its obligations?

What governance, disclosure, and reporting commitments is management prepared to accept?

And is there a credible investor audience for the opportunity?

Only after those questions have been addressed should the company determine the appropriate financing structure, regulatory pathway, and supporting technology.

A tokenized offering also involves real costs, including legal work, financial audits, offering preparation, technology, investor acquisition, and ongoing administration.

Not every business will be a good candidate.

Some companies will be better served by conventional debt, private equity, strategic investors, or retained earnings.

But for established businesses with strong fundamentals, real assets, and a compelling growth story, tokenization deserves serious consideration as part of the capital formation strategy.

The objective is not to tokenize a weak business into an attractive investment. It is to make a strong business accessible through a different capital market architecture.

The opportunity for the next generation of business growth

I do not believe traditional capital markets are going away.

Banks will continue to lend.

Private equity will continue to finance acquisitions and growth.

Venture capital will continue to fund high-risk innovation.

And public stock exchanges will remain essential to global capital formation.

But I do believe the menu of options available to business owners is going to expand.

The financial system is undergoing a transition toward more digital, programmable, and potentially accessible forms of ownership and capital formation.

The regulatory framework is evolving.

Major financial institutions are investing in the infrastructure.

And established businesses have real capital needs that are not always well served by traditional financing models.

These developments create an opportunity to rethink how capital reaches productive businesses.

Not every business will be ready.

Not every offering will succeed.

And tokenization alone will not resolve the difficult work of valuation, investor trust, or capital allocation.

But the direction is becoming clearer.

The next generation of capital markets may allow more businesses to finance growth on terms that better reflect their economics, ownership objectives, and long-term ambitions.

For business owners, the question is no longer simply whether to borrow, sell equity privately, or pursue an IPO.

It is whether a new generation of regulated, digitally enabled capital formation can offer a better alternative.

And for companies with real value to build upon, that is a conversation worth having now.

The future of tokenization is not about creating more tokens. It is about creating more ways for real businesses to access the capital they need to grow.

References and Further Reading

  1. McKinsey & Company. From Ripples to Waves: The Transformational Power of Tokenizing Assets (2024). Research on adoption, market potential, and the evolution of tokenized financial assets. Read the research.
  2. Bank for International Settlements. Annual Economic Report 2025. Analysis of tokenization and the development of next-generation financial market infrastructure. Read the report.
  3. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulation A: Guidance for Issuers. Official guidance on eligibility, offering limits, investor participation, and reporting requirements. Read the guidance.
  4. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulation A Offerings, statistics updated September 22, 2026. Historical offering activity and capital reported raised. Explore the data.
  5. SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce. Enchanting, but Not Magical: A Statement on the Tokenization of Securities (July 9, 2025). Discussion of the opportunities and regulatory responsibilities associated with tokenized securities. Read the statement.
  6. SEC Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets. Statement on Tokenized Securities (January 28, 2026). Clarification of tokenized securities structures and legal distinctions. Read the statement.
  7. DTCC. DTCC Authorized to Offer New Tokenization Service, Paving the Way to Tokenized DTC-Custodied Assets (December 11, 2025). Read the announcement.
  8. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Statement on the Innovation Exemption (September 17, 2026). Discussion of a proposed approach to facilitating innovation in tokenized securities markets. Read the statement.
Frank Ricciardi

Written by

Frank Ricciardi

Founder & Principal Advisor, FARVENTURES